On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:16:51 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:43*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:27:34 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:18:04 -0400, John H. wrote:

Journalists who divulge classified information should be jailed.

On what charge? *The First Amendment is very clear about freedom of the
press. *Funny, in the entire Constitution I can't find anything in it
about "classified" information. *There's a reason for that. *

If you truly believe journalists should be jailed for publishing
classified information, you really should consider a more appropriate
country for your ideological bent. *China, perhaps?

But it's OK to squelch Fox News for disagreeing with Obama?

Yes, I think journalists who divulge classified information should be
jailed. I should have said 'properly classified'. Information which,
if in the wrong hands, can be detrimental to our national security
should not be published just because it makes a 'good story'.

Amen.

John, you're listening to Rush too much. The administration has done
NOTHING to "squelch" Fox. That's pure propaganda lying.

Loogy, I will reply only to tell you that the trash you just posted
isn't worth a reply. Get your head out of the sand.