On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:05:54 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:36:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I always liked Little Johnny.
I'm highly offended - highly.

I'm about as offended as I can get.

Outraged you might say.

I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.
You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.

The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.

Duly noted. I'll see what I can do.

Now I'm even more offended because you didn't offer an immediate
apology and abase yourself as a offender for offending me offensively
in the first place.

I find this whole thread, offensive...

Well, you should be ashamed of yourself. There is nothing offensive
about Little Johnny, so it must be something after the first post of
the thread that you find offensive. Did Tom's taking offense at the
noeexistent offensiveness of Johnny's comments affect your
sensibilities, or was it the offensive comments of the union teacher
that offended you.

Remember, 'tis better to be ****ed off than ****ed on, unless you're
of a perticular persusion and ... oh, never mind.