On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:25:36 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 27, 5:31 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:
I always liked Little Johnny.
I'm highly offended - highly.
I'm about as offended as I can get.
Outraged you might say.
I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.
You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.
The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.
I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

Well you being offended isn't as serious as my being offended because
I was offended first therefore I have the better grievance in terms of
being offendingly offended by the original offender - offensively
speaking.

And now that I'm offended at your being offended by my being offended
originally offensively speaking, I demand reparations from you for
being offended.

I just sent him a lovely bouquet of offend me nots. I'll bet you could
get him to share with you.

I'm allergic to flower pollen and thus are not only outrageously
outraged at your offensive act of giving flowers but offensively
offended at your offensive offense.