|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 576
|
|
Delicious...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:26:16 -0400, Tosk
wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:56:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote:
After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public
funded not for profit?
Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the
Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient
than
a
bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate
private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer
public
option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a
Liberal.
Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit"
organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay
double for something that doesn't.
Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer.
Well, I guess it depends on who is in office at the time. When it was
Bush they sure didn't, that is if you listen to the chattering class.
Now miraculously a 10% unemployment rate is a recovery...
You really need to review the facts about the VA, for example, before you
make statements like this. Check out the person who's in charge of the
VA.
There is a technical recovery in process. Jobs are still a problem and
will
continue to be for quite a while. What's your point?
Can you say, double standard...??
What's that? You're clear as mud.
lol lol
I guess I could take Plume fishing, or sit down and eat.. I just can't
wade through the numerous out of context and references to
intellectually dishonest rhetoric.. Sorry Plumeeeee. Just don't have the
time anymore.
Exactly. lol
|