On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:02:06 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in news:cl1dd59n32hnagfkbk55pjo07ukp48qiub@
4ax.com:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:40:23 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:44:58 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

Why do you connect FOX News and the Republican party? FOX News is
conservative but it isn't Republican.

All Fox News does is advance Republican propaganda.

Do you know the difference between a conservative and a Republican?

He thinks Fox news is Republican more than conservative - you think it
is more conservative than Republican. That doesn't mean the two of
you disagree about which is which. But neither has backed up your
choice with evidence.

The Republican platform was created with lots of compromise and lots
of fighting (as is the nature of such platforms).

There isn't a conservative platform - instead there are many
conservative platforms - some which are contradictory. Obviously a
conservative Roman Catholic, a conservative Mormon, a conservative
millionaire businessman, and a conservative racist, and a conservative
Muslim have different platforms. (As do Liberal versions of all of
the above).

Well said. Roger Ailes and his assigns hew tightly to the Republican
agenda.


Notice that he said (As do liberal versions of all the above). Do you
think that CNN gets its talking points from the Democratic Party or is it
simply liberal biased like MSNBC?

CNN is a hodge podge of everyone's talking points. They're just as
likely to pick up something from the R's as they are from the D's.

MSNBC is certainly in the liberal camp but neither CNN nor MSNBC
fabricate stories like Fox.

Neither do they astroturf taxpayer gatherings like Fox does. Fox news
people not only promote these gatherings they "report" on but they're
in the crowd getting them riled up before the cameras are turned on.

Is that news or premeditated, produced propaganda?