On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:34:29 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 13, 10:18*am, "lab~rat :-)" wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:19 -0400, queenie
puked:





On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:44:10 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

* * * *Um... not likely. *Runaway inflation is not a result of economic
growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our
esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off and
which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's puny mind
could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. * *They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

* * * *I terms of principle, I fully agree. *In terms of degree, I must part
company with you a bit. *Though my logical mind knew things could be
worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. *Obama
shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence, avarice,
hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of value. *I can
hardly believe that it would have been possible to outstrip Bush by such
a margin, and yet here we are. *Amazing.

Get back to me on that after eight years! *Jeez, the man's been in
office for NINE months!!!!

And amid the major crises in our country, one of his first efforts was
to fund abortions in other countries...
--


as opposed to bush who, as a first act, restricted funding for
abortions in other countries.

Bush never did like baby killing, especially when the USA was paying
for it.