wf3h wrote in
:

On Oct 13, 10:18*am, "lab~rat :-)" wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:19 -0400, queenie puked:





On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:44:10 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

* * * *Um... not likely. *Runaway inflation is not a result of
economic growth, but of out of control printing of paper money,
which our esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to
kick off and which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights
GW's puny mind could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. * *They both work for Big Business, with the huge
tax of a huge deficit we will pay.

* * * *I terms of principle, I fully agree. *In terms of degree, I
must part
company with you a bit. *Though my logical mind knew things could be
worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. *Obama
shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence,
avarice, hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of value.
*I can hardly believe that it would have been possible to outstrip
Bush by such a margin, and yet here we are. *Amazing.

Get back to me on that after eight years! *Jeez, the man's been in
office for NINE months!!!!

And amid the major crises in our country, one of his first efforts was
to fund abortions in other countries...
--


as opposed to bush who, as a first act, restricted funding for
abortions in other countries.


Um, our money, other countries. Exactly what is the issue? I don't want to
pay for abortions in the US let alone in foreign lands.

And what is the moral imperative to steal my money to kill babies in foreign
countries?