Jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:58 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 12, 12:35 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that
Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.
how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?
When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in
2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.
me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.
You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.
yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.
so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves
And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets
on how
they really operate.
bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money
They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.-

guess you forgot bush was president the last 8 years.

i'll just keep repeating this since it's obvious you have alzheimer's

Then by that logic, Bush should get the Nobel prize Obama just got.
Can't have it both ways and say there is a rational bone in your body.

Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize, not for economics. That's a different
subject. Are you really that dumb?

Bush started too many wars that didn't need to happen to get a peace
prize. The economic results weren't any better, eliminating any chance
for that prize either.

The Afghanistan war was so poorly managed that we spent 7 years fighting
with no actual accomplishment. That should warrant a jail term, not a
peace prize.

History won't be kind to Bush and I'm sure he knows it.

So you think Obama should get a Nobel prize for 8 months....

Yet isn't responsible for $1.3B trillion debt-spend in the same period???

You have a serious rationality disorder if you think that way.

I do agree with certain of your statements of the war, be it Bush or
Obama, we need to quit pandering to Afgan BS or get the hell out. Let
the Saudis fund their own protection. But there is no delivery of
pease, just US, Canadian and other dead friendlies.