On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:41:58 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 9, 10:41*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. *He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second *- a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. *His words.

uh...let me see...you're saying he wants to add troops to a war he
thinks is important. and that proves he's not adding troops? and the
war is unpopular PRECISELY because bush was so incompetent.


Oh, by the way? *The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...usa/barackobam...

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

ROFLMAO!! anyone can nominate anyone for the nobel peace prize.

and that's a busted link



"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

and george bush's fundamentalist view of christianity?

how'd that work out?

Man, you are really out of it.

Unfortunate - you seemed a pretty reasonable guy.