View Single Post
  #168   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
tiny tiny is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 42
Default vatican astronomer blasts creationism

In article d5246d62-d008-48df-86a1-36dd5b083917
@o36g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 5, 8:31*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/5/09 9:27 PM, Tim wrote:



On Oct 5, 7:48 pm, H the *wrote:
On 10/5/09 7:51 PM, Tim wrote:


On Oct 5, 8:50 am, H the * *wrote:
On 10/5/09 8:48 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:08:10 -0400, Wayne.B
* * *wrote:


On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:57:35 -0400,
wrote:


On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:09:17 -0400, Wayne.B
* * *wrote:


On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:36:03 -0400, JohnRant
* * *wrote:


Why should public school students be subjected to the faith based
beliefs of others?


Why should students not be told of the beliefs of others?


That's fine if you're teaching a course on religion, not so fine if
you're teaching a course called science.


There's nothing wrong with mentioning the controversy in a science
class.


We'll have to disagree on that. * Once you accomodate the faith based
belief of your choice in science class, where do you stop?


You can say that about anything. *Mainstreaming special ed students
started off as just one period a day - now it's an entire school day.
Used to be band and drama were after school activities, then one
period a week, then every day.


Just sayin'. *:)


There are quite a few different interpretations of the Book of Genesis,
not to mention all the other religions of the world.


Heh. You know it's funny - most religions, faiths, primitive pagans
and assorted heathens mostly agree - first there was nothing and then
there was something.


Now I grant you, the various reinterpretations of Genesis by flawed
humans promoting their own ideas presents conflicting/competing dogma,
but at the essential points, they are pretty much in agreement.


Well except for me that is - I still think it was Aliens. *:)


If you take a literal interpretation of Genesis, it was caused by God.
But another way to interpret Genesis is with an eye towards evolution.
Try it sometime - it's a fun exercise.


Science and the scientific method are about provable facts.


True enough. Fairly obvious.


Everything else is religion or philosophy.


I agree - global warming, peak oil, wind/solar energy. *:)


~~ now come one - you just knew that was coming :) *~~


The point was the relevance of creationism in science classes or,
indeed, in public schools. No relevance, should not be discussed except
perhaps as an example of religious superstition.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All


There's many things that science can't explain, Harry.


* *I myself haven't seen anything in the Bible that would discount dyed-
in-the-wool, rock hard, chiseled-in-stone proof of scientific
anything.


however, I don't see science being the absolute authority on the
beginning of mankind, or beyond *to before the Universes.


So, until science can present solid proof of origins of creation (big
bang theory included) I'll remain a Creationist that believes in
"Intelligent Design"


besides, *even if you leave out the Judao-christian belief system, it
really does no harm to look at another point of view in school as an
option, because I never hear evolution as being called "fact" but I
hear it called "theory" a lot. And weather answerable, or unanswerable
questions, there's too many "what if's" with theory.


I don't care what you or any other "believer" believes...just keep it
out of the public schools.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All


Thank you for your input, Harry. I'll take that into consideration.


I don't mean that in a negative way, Tim. I simply am opposed to the
*teaching* of any sort of religious beliefs in the K-12 public schools.

I am 100% supportive of private religious beliefs that are taught at
home, in church/synagogue/mosque schools and at the various houses of
worship.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All


I'm sorry if I took it a bit personal,Harry. I'm not a "Crammer" but I
believe it (Creationism) should be allowed as an option.or at least
not discouraged.


**** him, he really doesn't really mean it. I have never had anybody
push religeon on any of my family, but many times have had athiests push
their agenda on them and me, mocking our beliefs...