In article 73189557-9508-4e20-ab5f-6395961e4fe1
@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 2, 3:26*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54*pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". *~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.

Have you ever looked at the time line.. It was the dem "do noting
congress" (as Pelosi called it) that pooched the economy by not reigning
in Dodd, Rangle, Kerry, and Obama from raiding the mortgage market... Gt
a clue man.