"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:51:58 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:43 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, Jack wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on
the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".

Will we have a pronouncement on how the IOC is racist?


Or, more likely, they decided to give Brazil a chance, and they were
convinced the games would be financed properly.

I find it highly interesting that you and a couple of others continually
mention race. Are you compensating for something?

He's just projecting what Harry will say sooner or later.

I wonder what she expects when her BFF is calling us racist with every
post?

The IOC is obviously racist. That's one more reason Laura Bush would
have been successfull in getting the Olympics here. Well, maybe not in
Chicago, but at least in Crawford or Dallas or somewhere cool.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


What's a BFF? I think you're making that case all by yourself.

--
Nom=de=Plume