"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html

On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C.
Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes
but apes evolved from humans.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3

And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area.

Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution
goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah,
yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a
hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened
by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the
exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's
evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we
popped.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :)
I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but
anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution
theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are
calling it ardi or emmm or something like that.


It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however.

We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution. That still leaves room
for a god or gods to be the creator of the creatures we evolved from. Some
nice Jehovah's ladies stopped by today while I was out exercising the dog.
They must have seen that I need enlightening. After they delivered their
message from Jehova, I tried my theory on them but they didn't buy it. So
where are you in this Cre/Evo controversy. I'll bet you have some strong
opinions.


Are you claiming you don't "subscribe" to evolution? My opinion is supported
by the facts of evolution.

--
Nom=de=Plume