Buoyancy is Imaginary
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
Jeff wrote:
KLC Lewis wrote:
Never argue bouyancy with Roger Long. ;-)
Why? I think Roger is making a big deal of a very fine distinction.
Its true that an object that is said to be "buoyant" does not generate
a force by itself, the force really comes from water pressure which in
turn is caused by gravity. But, the force is real and buoyancy is
simply a convenient way to aggregate the net pressure on an object.
If there were no force (regardless of what we call it) holding up a
ship, it would sink.
There are, of course, imaginary forces, such as Coriolis which appears
in non-inertial reference frames, but that is a different thing.
Budding naval architects should teach themselves the rudiments of
dimensional analysis... and then they won't make appalling cockups in
their use of incompatible units.
So who do you think is making an appalling cockup? And in which context?
|