On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:50:31 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:22:53 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:10:17 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:39:15 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:08:45 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:50:20 -0400, D wrote:

I would never tackle a job like that. If I had that
sort of problem I, too, would "redistribute the wealth"!

I've rarely paid others to do this sort of job and received the
quality that I expect. I, and others, prefer to do this sort of job so
that I know that it is done right.

To you, getting the job done right is obviously more important than
redistributing wealth. Now we know where your priorities lie.

Sure wish some other folks felt the same way.

Sigh.... Just another point-of-view issue blown out of proportion....

I thought I was obviously joking. Must have been too subtle.

The recent tenor in this newsgroup makes it impossible to sort out
what is tongue-in-cheek and what is seething anger....

No problem. And, you're right.
--

John H