On Sep 24, 7:25*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:31*pm, Jack wrote:
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,
Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each
had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. *You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

says the guy who thinks only rich right wing presidents should have
unlimited powers

Never said that, but you're the guy that backs a president that not
only goes back on his promise to rescind the previous administration's
powers, but then make an unprecedented power grab of his own that his
own party admonishes him for. All the while you blindly march along,
eh comrade?

You either just love to argue, or you're exceptionally stupid. Who am
I kidding, it's both. I'm done.