"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 8, 10:15 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 8, 5:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Katie Ohara" wrote in message

...

I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.

Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad

Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general

Jesus would hardly approve.

1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.

Would Jesus approve of the violence perpetrated by Mohammed and his
army?

Of course not. Now, answer the same question about the Crusades.

2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.

Does that action follow the teachings of Jesus? You evidently don't
think so, since you believe Jesus wouldn't have approved of the
Crusades or any other violence by Christains.

Thus, Christians are just as bloodthirsty as Muslims.

--
Nom=de=Plume