View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jack[_3_] Jack[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,005
Default I just don't get it...

On Sep 8, 10:15*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 8, 5:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Katie Ohara" wrote in message


....


I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.


--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.


Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general


Jesus would hardly approve.


1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.


Would Jesus approve of the violence perpetrated by Mohammed and his
army?


2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.


Strawman. What Muslims believe have nothing to do with who Mohammed
was. Oh wait, yes it does. They beleive that he was a general who
conquered an entire region with violence.

Does that action follow the teachings of Jesus? You evidently don't
think so, since you believe Jesus wouldn't have approved of the
Crusades or any other violence by Christains.