"JohnH" wrote in message
...
'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a
president.

You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to
something deep-seated and fearful.

Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the
guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps
that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal
'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about
excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found
success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'.

I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but
that wouldn't be fair.

Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance,
lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think
you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all
of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did.
Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now?

Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated,
fearful racism?

Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will.
While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney
thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child
had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain
about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke
to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting
president.

--
Nom=de=Plume