On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:34:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news
I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included,
but
you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I
don't
think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's
more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away
one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly.
I'm
not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead.

There you go. Now you're doing the puppy thing with Harry Krause, whom
you didn't know.

You sound very angry. I don't know H K either.


I'll give this response of yours the comment it deserves - pure
horse****.

This seems to be a theme of yours.

'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a
president.

You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to
something deep-seated and fearful.

Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the
guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps
that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal
'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about
excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found
success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'.

Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated,
fearful racism?
--
John H

"Vote for a Democrat, it's easier than working!"