Gene wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:35:22 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:31:11 -0400, John H.
wrote:

As I've said several times, there is only one person using the phrase
'kill the elderly' - you. Apparently you think it's cute. I think it's
stupid.
Maybe you don't really want to know or just aren't paying attention!
According to Google, there are about 371,994 other references.....

http://raymondpronk.wordpress.com/20...ur-time-is-up/
http://www.thefinalprayer.com/2009/0...derly-exposed/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb368Ek_4vw
http://www.mixx.com/stories/6985366/...sed_nazi_obama
http://brewcitybrawler.typepad.com/b...e-elderly.html
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=113851103434
The question is weather John or I have said it... The answer is still,
NO!

Well, you have to admit that both of you got fast and loose with
words: substituting death for end of life... the connotations are
hugely diverse and mirrored the false talking points of some folks
with an agenda.
Fair and Balanced:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...reform-debate/
vs. reality:
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?not...8572414&ref=mf

The "end of life" stuff was signed into law by H. W. Bush in 1992 and
has been out there for nearly two decades. Nobody said squat then, now
it is all some folks can talk about... most of whom are, now, talking
out of the OTHER side of their mouth. So, what changed?

It's all about the issue and the Republicans grabbed the issue and have
turned it on the Democrats. It matters not what the minor points are nor
where they originated, the issue is the take over of 1/6 of the economy
by the Democrats.

Politics is a blood sport and it has always been a blood sport. Et tu
Brute comes to mind.