On Sep 5, 5:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:42:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"



wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
....
Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your
diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as
they were Republicans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives
about their speeches. *They also did not issue north korean-like
presidential worship lesson plans.

This is just looney... you can *say* this, but that doesn't make it true..

Most of us have no problems with
the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like
something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this
administration is.

Apparently it was ok when Reagan talked about his tax-cut proposals to kids
and when Bush the First asked kids to write him with how they could help
him.

But, it's not ok when Obama does this.

Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons.

Compared to what? Bush II?

There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would
allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. *It would
not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him,
the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives
being put in danger by having morons running health care. *You do not
allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no
matter how they vote.

Over 70% of the voting public is in favor of a public option, which despite
your attempt to make a competitive option sound like a gov't takeover of US
healthcare, isn't. So, what you're saying is that 70% of the voting public
has no intelligence. Quite a statement.

Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. *

They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside
these sore losers and bigots.

Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete
failure. Getting a law degree, no big deal, that is for slightly
motivated people who simply are not smart enough to do science,
engineering or run a business.
Before running for office, he ran the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and
was a total failure. He was a failure as a senator and as a
president.
Teaching a college class does not mean anything about high school
education. BTW, my brother and sister were editors of Law review at
FSU and Uof F and both say it is a role for suckers that looks good on
a resume but is otherwise meaningless.
His entire approach to this speech has been clueless in the extreme.
The Soviet-like directive to school systems that seem guaranteed to
cause problems and the worshipful lesson plans were done so badly as
to make one wonder about his sanity and intelligence. However, I do
not wonder, it is plain to me that he is simply stupid. Bush was a
genius by comparison. Bozoma cannot get anything done even though his
party controls both houses of congress while Bush got most of what he
wanted even when the Dems controlled both houses. Oboma is simply
stupid and has surrounded himself by people are more so.