On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:01:43 -0400, NotNow wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:02:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 2, 2:32 pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.
Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--
because we know bush ****ed it up so bad that we now have to clean the
mess up before we leave. i know that, to rednecks, they think liberals
want to cut and run, but that shows how little rednecks know about
anything
Uh, uh, what mess?
--
John H

The infrastructure is in shambles, Bush promised to rebuild it.

Bull****. And, you know it. That's not BO's excuse for staying there.
--
John H


Well, then, take a look for yourself.......

http://www.cfr.org/publication/10971/

http://worldfocus.org/blog/2009/02/2...gue-iraq/4209/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/h...raq/html/1.stm

Okay, now make excuses.....

Read what you post:

"I wish there is a person to blame or specific side to throw the blame
on but unfortunately there are countless sides and people to throw the
blame on…it’s all about corruption, decades of falling behind the
medical developments, physicians and doctors with little medical
ethics who will have high ethics when they leave Iraq, doctors who are
really bad in their job but holds important positions because they are
from a specific political party or they know “people”, sectarian
violence, gangs working under the mask of religion, people with agenda
of brain-killing Iraq…and the list goes on."

And, don't post crap that's three and a half years old pretending it
is current.

And, 'Bama hasn't said he's going to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure.
So, why's he keeping troops there?
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.