View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jack[_3_] Jack[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,005
Default Worshipping at the altar of Gaia...

On Sep 2, 1:44*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message

...

In article ,
Not if you buy a good one. And CFB's have come a long way. AND they last
forever!


Yeah, just like the Mercury in the land fills.. Have you read about the
area of China surrounding the plants where they make these things?


Yet again, there are those pesky facts getting in the way. It takes much
more mercury to make the standard light bulb than the is in the new ones. If
you don't believe me, look it up. The new ones are a win-win for everything.

--
Nom=de=Plume


As usual, you're confused; that's completely false. Mercury is not
used in the manufacturing of incandescent bulbs.

There have been studies that suggest that using CFBs saves enough
energy to offset the amount of mercury they contain... but that
depends on ALL the energy being consumed as having been produced by
coal-burning power plants. Burning coal releases mercury, so the
power saved (and mercury not released) by using CFBs is supposed to
offset the mercury content of the CFB. If some of your power comes
from another source (nuclear, hydro) then this argument goes away. As
the maximum saving is around 7%, it doesn't take much to wipe that
away.