On Aug 30, 10:45*pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 10:10 pm, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 10:06 am, BAR wrote:
NotNow wrote:
BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 27, 7:59 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
use of nuclear (for
you right wingers, that's 'nukular') missiles
And the Bay of Pigs, what kind of moron would agree to such a thing
AND then not support it once it was going? *Pure Kennedy cowardice.-
actually it was stupidity. the cuban missile crisis showed that
kennedy had the cojones to go toe to toe with the russkies.
Do you understand the difference between planning and implementation?-
do you understand the concept of national credibility?
National Credibility. Is that when you put a guy in jail for life for
murdering a couple of hundred people on an airplane but then let him
out on compassionate reasons because he has terminal cancer and is
going to die in three months?
When did the U.S. do that?
I thought the subject was national credibility, not US national
credibility.
why? did scotland put missiles in turkey in the 50's?
Because they Scottish kept draining the fuel, running it through a loaf
of bread and drinking it. They call it rocket juice. It has more of a
kick than torpedo juice.

guess they didn't too many missiles, then, right?

"guess they didn't too many missiles, then, right?"

What the hell does that mean?

it means far be it from me to argue with a man who believes the cuban
missile crisis was sparked by the fact the scottish run their whiskey
through a loaf of bread.