Internet fairness doctrine
Jack wrote:
On Aug 28, 4:23 pm, NotNow wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Aug 28, 10:08 am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article 5c867d06-3ce7-4ff1-bfa5-
,
says...
HK is in trouble now. One of Bozoma's "czars" is proposing an
"Internet fairness doctrine" covering all speech on the internet.
Well, just like the ACLU outing 42 CIA agents to a known terrorist
group, and the New Black Panther party getting to brandish weapons at a
voting booth.. The "fairness" will be a bit one sided.. Harry will be
considered "mainstream", he will be fine..
Damned liberals. They want to kill your puppies, too.
Can you refute either of the facts I noted above...?
Jesus.....you make it sound like tthe panthers were there forcing people
to vote a certain way! The internet fairness doctrine? The guy knows
it'll never gain legs, so is more or less just talking about it. He even
goes so far as to say that if it ever happened it would be
unconstitutional. So, I beg to ask, where did you get the information
that the Obama administration is proposing this idea?
You see, it's not a question of either proving or disproving something.
It's the intellectual dishonesty of someone saying that the admin. is
proposing it when that's not true.
**** that! You are completely uninformed here. Read the ****ing
doctrine, read Jacks post above so you at least have a slight idea how
the doctrine will work..
Here, in simple language.. The doctrine will force public radio to air
opposing opinions or pay huge fines which would put them out of
business. At the same time, liberal radio doesn't work and nobody wants
to listen to it. So the way it works is, right wing shows would draw the
same advertising revenue they do now, but a Washington panel would
decide what was right leaning and of course, even Al Sharpton considers
himself a "moderate" so we know where the line would be. Anyway, for
every hour of profitable right wing radio, the station would have to
play an hour of basically free left wing radio (remember, left wing
radio is not and has not ever been able to sustain itself in a free
market). So either the radio stations play have of their prime time
radio time free, cutting their gross income by 50% (what company can
give away half of it's services?) or just don't play the right wing
radio programs.. What do you think the outcome will be there? It will
censor anything "moderates" like Pelosi, and Jessi Jackson think it
right wing...
Now if you can't understand that, I just can't bother here anymore...
pssst, it doesn't matter WHAT it says. The author even stated that it's
unconstitutional so it can't happen.
The liberals have been saying that all sorts of unconstitutional
things have happened over the last 8 years. Using your logic they're
wrong, since that can't happen.
That's not logic. Logic would be if I thought that a LAW COULD GET
PASSED in congress that is unconstitutional.
You've got to be kidding!! Remember the Patriot Act? Remember how
loudly many people howled that it was unconstitutional? Remember that
*after* it was passed into *law*, at least one section of it was
struck down by the courts as, in fact, *being* unconstitutional?
Now you're trying to say that this can't happen? Well, it already
has, and can again! You're going off the deep end, loogy. Reel it
back in.
What could be more pleasing than seeing right-wing trash like you,
JustHate and the others suffering a bit of apoplexy.
|