In article ,
says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:43:11 -0500, jpjccd wrote:


While skinny dipping in the public domain, I stumbled across this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scienti fic_assessment_of_global_warming

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
List_of_authors_from_Climate_Change_2007:_The_Phys ical_Science_Basis
There is no consensus.

The debate must continue. The data must be made available for peer review.

Anyone claiming that the science is settled is pursuing a political agenda
and not involved in science.


I guess that's why the US military considers it a national security risk.


Anything to boost the budget.

Naw, these appeasers don't understand military. They make contingincy
for almost anything they can come up with... Including things that might
not happen ever, like GW...

--
Wafa free since 2009