"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"BAR" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:43:11 -0500, jpjccd wrote:


While skinny dipping in the public domain, I stumbled across this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scienti fic_assessment_of_global_warming

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
List_of_authors_from_Climate_Change_2007:_The_Phys ical_Science_Basis

There is no consensus.

The debate must continue. The data must be made available for peer
review.

Anyone claiming that the science is settled is pursuing a political
agenda and not involved in science.


I guess that's why the US military considers it a national security risk.

That would be because of the social upheaval that might well come about.
What if south america starts to really suffer, will this lead to massive
immigration, followed by massive force to try to stop it, followed perhaps
by an all out war etc