"Keith Nuttle" wrote in message
...
It has been nearly 200 years and the debate on evolution is still going
on. Cancer has been a topic of investigation for over 60 years, and still
there is no cure for cancer.

You're just playing with words. "Debate" is a meaningless phrase when it
comes to evolution.

Many cancers have been cured.


How can the debate on the climate and global warming, a significantly more
complex system, be understood after about 20 years. The climate cycles
are over 100000 years in length and they claim to understand them with
about 200 years of data, of which the last 50 years are accurate. Sounds
like poor science to me.

You're very clearly not a scientist familiar with the subject. Thus, you
rely on wild exaggerations promoted by unreliable sources.


If those that promote global warming truly believe that global warming
was a problem that had to be addressed they would be 100% behind nuclear
power which has NO greenhouse gasses. Since the supporters of global
warming are against nuclear energy, the only conclusion is it is strictly
politics.

No one "promotes" global warming, except perhaps polluters. The solution to
global climate change can be partially addressed by nuclear, but not
completely. Reduction in meat consumption is also a partial (and
significant) solution. If you're talking about environmentalists, since your
language is a bit fuzzy, many are willing to consider nuclear energy, many
are not. There are waste issues with nuclear fission technology that hasn't
been solved, not to mention security issues.

--
Nom=de=Plume