Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:21:31 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Gene wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:06:24 -0400, Guzzistimo penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:31:29 -0400, Gene
wrote:
|
|On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:03:19 -0400, Guzzistimo
wrote:
|
|If the rationale for invading Iraq was to get their oil, what's
|Obama's rationale for Afghanistan -- Heroin?
|
|http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/wo..._r=1&th&emc=th
|
|I think we are there because of this:
|
|http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english...ent_339861.htm
|
|Ah, the Bush Rationale.
|
|After Inauguration Day, the Bush Rationale is no longer applicable.

Bush got us in there. We're there. We could have just left
(cut-and-run, some people would say) when Obama took office, but how
smart would that be?

You don't really have a point, do you?

Yes, Gene, he does! Remember conservative = good, liberal = evil. That's
the republican mantra!!!

Loogy, that's not even cute any more.


It never was cute. It does show reverse harryanism, though.
Why are we in Afghanistan? If we're there simply because Bush got us
there, then our reason for being there is pretty stupid.

If there is another reason, what is it?
--
John H

Uh, no. Sometimes it takes time to clean ****. That's what Bush left us
in Afghanistan.