In article , "Giga"
says...

"tg" wrote in message
...
On Aug 25, 8:04 am, BAR wrote:
tg wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:07 am, BAR wrote:
Giga Giga wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:04:21 -0700 (PDT), BOfL
wrote:
How can there be an idea of perfection or a perfect state of being,
if
such a thing has never existed or been experienced previously? Such
a
concept can only come from an extrinsic source, something outside
of
the human experience, ergo the possibility of "God.") Perhaps
someone sometime will provide some reasonable answers to this
conundrum. No one has yet, to my satisfaction.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
And what answers would be adequate?
Many want proof, but dont know what the proof should be.
BOfL
What I was hoping to do was to point out what seems to me to be a bit
of an irony - a contradiction of dogmas of those that are wholesale
subscribers to global warming alarmism and also adopt a stoic,
clinical definition of evolution and death. It's difficult for me to
imagine how the conflict of those perspectives can be reconciled. I'm
more than willing to be enlightened if for some reason I'm confused
in
comprehending those perspectives.
Some things can be changed by human beings and some things can't. If
global
warming is caused by human beings then presumably we can stop it as
well. If
global warming is likely to lead to consequences we don't want then we
may
want to stop it. Also we seem to have the means to stop it or
alleviate it,
by reducing co2 output, and maybe other techniques. So if we can and
want to
stop it why not? Its the same principle we apply to everything, for
instance
if you are uncomfortable, and you can change that, then why not? If
you can
forsee that leaving a pan on the stove is going to burn what you are
cooking
then turn down the heat or take it off the cooker?
However, the more sun light that is shed on the actual "data" that is
used as the basis for proponents of the human caused global warming the
fewer the scientists who support human caused global warming become.

That's interesting. Could you please provide the data to support your
claim?

Yes, it is all in the public domain. If you keep up with current events
you shouldn't have any problem finding the information on your own.

OK. I'd just like to point out that there is absolute proof of
Anthropogenic Climate Change. All of it is in the public domain. You
shouldn't have trouble finding it on your own. And there are no
scientists who disagree with it.

What a laugh.... "No scientists"?? If I show you one, will you shut up
and admit you are full of ****?


+Thats not true by a really long long way!



--
Wafa free since 2009