BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
J i m wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".


In some states, there are ways around the "validation" because of
the gun show loophole, which must be closed.

Why? The 1st amendment isn't limited to those who pass a background
check?

The validation process isn't stringent enough if card carrying
loonies like Krause can get themselves validated. But sadly, closing
the gun show loophole won't prevent professional murderers and other
armed crime doers from obtaining the tools of their trade.

If we stopped law abiding citizens from owning guns then it will just
be the criminals and government with guns.


It was the gun show loophole being discussed, moron.

Show me where in the 2nd amendment it states that you are required to
have a background check? In fact which of the first 10 amendments, the
bill of rights, requires that a person have a background check?

I am waiting for you to put forth the well regulated militia argument.
Because if you do you will have to turn in all of your firearms.


We have by law background checks. If you think the federal and state
laws on that matter are non-Constitutional, well, go fight them. I
accept them as necessary.

Whenever I buy a firearm, I go through the instant federal check for a
long gun, and the additional state check if it is a pistol. The "gun
show loophole" only facilitates gun trafficking by criminals.