On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:11:36 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article 523eb17a-073b-4857-87cb-86b447d2eff6@
18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says...
On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7

wrote:
Wait until someone
starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet
names.
If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a
highly accurate descriptor.
--

Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm
Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No
names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed,
all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm
Emanual...

At the same time, reverse harry is kind of a compliment.. I mean, being
against everything Harry stands for is the only way for a thinking
person to be...


It's easy to be reverseharry. Just remember, everything liberal = bad,
everything conservative = good.

Besides, I really resent the idea that we can't disagree, no name
calling, no lies, no disrespect, just questions and a different opinion
and still get compared to WAFA... None of "us" have been calling you or
Thunder or Gene any names... So I still suggest that you shouldn't be
calling grown men with respectful differences in opinion, "harry" in any
form...

Hell, let Loogy call his little names.

If I'd voted for Obama I'd be feeling pretty miserable also.

I'd much rather be the reverse of Harry than the same as Harry. Talk
about being miserable!