JLH LXV wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:39:51 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 15, 7:17 am, JLH LXV wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:04:56 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

for health care reform; gets hit with boycott from the left. He authored a
well-written piece in the Wall Street Journal
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57434217007286...)
Apparently because he didn't spout the Dems party line, a number of loony
liberals want to boycott Whole Foods. See:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Story?id=8322658&page=1
None of his detractors offered facts to refute the article.
Mantra of the loony left: "Don't confuse me with facts. My mind is made up."
You're right. All of the detractors had the same theme, "He's not
doing what the liberal organic food eaters want him to do. Therefore
he's bad." Their arguments have not one thing to do with his
recommendation, which make a hell of a lot of sense.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
only socialized medicine makes sense. the free enterprise approach is
DOA

Why bother to read something which makes sense and try to rebut the
points. You've firmly established yourself as another Donnie. I'd say
Harry, but Harry's got a little more sense than Donnie.

Go for it.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"a little more sense"? You are giving WAFA a lot more credit than he
deserves.