BAR wrote:
NotNow wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 11, 11:16 am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article , says...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 10, 9:35 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya
failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The
Obama
admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas
ouster
had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and
Castro lost.
zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor,
believes
in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of
law
is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to
some
of us, constitutional principles still have meaning.
To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras
removed
the sitting president for illegal activities. The Congress of
Honduras
appointed the new president under the Courts supervision.
As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is
trivialized or ignored. They still think there is no opposition to
their national health care plan.
Really.. I just watched 25 questions to Arlen Specter (sp?) and
only one
was supportive (even she had problems with the bill), yet the moron
stood there and said something like "most Americans want this bill".
What is he smoking...
Why would he have to be smoking something, Scotty? Here, take a look:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/121664/ma...hcare-reform-t...


I have read the Honduran constitution and it specifically required the
military to act to remove the Pres, not the police. Zelaya was not
exiled, he was simply told that if he came back he would be arrested
for his illegal actions. He can go back whenever he wants but he will
be arrested as REQUIRED by the constitution.
The reality is that Obama DOES NOT support constitutional law. Zelaya
attempted to mount a coup and got caught. Thunder sis simply wrong
and does not even try to find out the real situation.

What does that have to do with the facts I posted about the fallacy
that most people in the U.S. don't want the government to help sort
out the screwed up healthcare system?

What is the #1 problem with health care, not health insurance, in the USA?

Again, what does this have to do with the fact that it is pure fallacy
that "most" people in the U.S. don't want the government to help sort
out the healthcare debacle?

The right is sending out SO much misinformation that it's kind of funny.
Last night, ABC news. They interview one of those screaming, yelling,
off the wall right wingers at a town hall meeting. Sir, what is your
main concern? "I don't want the government telling me I have to give up
my private insurance". Sir, does it say that in the bill? "Yes, if you
read page 16". Now, he was either coached to say that or he didn't read
it. Why? Because what it says is simply that the private insurance
companies have five years to comply with new government guidelines about
things like not being allowed to drop you because of certain conditions,
etc. Now, again, someone is either stupid or not being honest. Which?