| 
				 Radar vs GPS/Sounder 
 
			
			On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:48:11 +0000, Jack Dale wrote:
 On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:07:50 -0800, "Lloyd Sumpter"  wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Thinking of getting radar for Far Cove, mainly for this planned trip to
 WCVI,
 which has lots of fog.
 
 Now, I've survived 20+ years of sailing Georgia Strait, etc. without radar.
 If it's really foggy, I just stay put. If I venture out, I use several nav aids
 including GPS to determine my position, blow my horn and listen.
 
 I'm thinking that, even WITH radar, I wouldn't venture out in unfamiliar
 waters in dense fog. And if I was out and the fog rolled in on me, I would
 think that GPS, sounder and a good chart would be better to find that anchorage
 than radar, assuming I could see at least 100 ft or so.
 
 Comments?
 
 I agree that a GPS, sounder and good charts are necessary.  But given a choice
 between a chart plotter and radar, I would go with radar. The major reason is
 that radar will provide an indication of what is around me, mainly other
 vessels.  In Juan de Fuca, that is a big consideration.
 
 Once you spend some time with radar you can interpret the screen quite easily.
 This would permit you to find the anchorage.  Additionally, the racon buoys
 permit an great radar fix.
 
 
 Thanks for the input!
 
 I didn't mean an either/or scenario - it's more like: if I have
 GPS/sounder/charts, what extra does radar give me? And of course, it DOES show
 vessels, etc., but I'm thinking that's mainly a consideration in fog, and I'm
 wondering if I would venture out even if I HAD radar (after all, what if the
 radar quits?).
 
 So is radar worth it for the 1 day a year I MIGHT venture out in fog?
 
 Or, to put it differently, what ELSE is radar good for? Can I use it to
 determine if a freighter 10 miles away is on a collision course with me? Do
 others normally run with radar on, even if it's clear? Why?
 
 Lloyd Sumpter
 "Far Cove" Catalina 36
 
 
 |