"H the K" wrote in message
news
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html

I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he is a
dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no results.
Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like printing and
creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are now
setting new records for government debt and inflation creating money
creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence scale?
Somewhat below pond scum?

Yep. Obama is a dimwit. He could have become a great president but BO
(Bailout Obama) and promises are all that he will be known for in 5 or 10
years. OK, being black another. But his economics are centered on wealthy
and statism, not the betterment of the middle class. And it is the middle
class that makes US great, not the banks, or rich holding GM paper.

He is investing in dead rotten turkeys.

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning less
than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes of those
earning more.

I hear his lips move, but I see different in legislation and Obama's
spending habits. It used to be called a liar when you did that. What is
the new politically correct acronym for this these days? I still think liar
and deceitful are appropriate.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

Have Obama define in an un*******ised and precise way in law what wealthy
really means. To greedy cash starved government the definition is going to
be the same as yours.

Canada added a tax bracket some 25 years ago that taxed just the top
percentage or two. Today you only need to earn 10% above average to make
that rate. Over time it will be a screw turn on the middle class as 1%
become 5% becomes 10% becomes 40% etc.

It even drives medical costs higher. Tax a rich dentist more, he will just
jack up the rates to get the same or more net. Either that or live with
rotten teeth. In fact, many costs in society will behave just like that
removing America from the economically viable places to live.

Americans have it so damned good, Obama supporters for the most part I bet
are much less traveled than non-Obama supporters. For if so, they would
realize more people benefit much more from an American economic model than a
UK or Canadian one. I am one of those rare birds that has lived in all
three. And the US is under attack from within.

I just hope your average voter pulls his head out of their arses before 2010
and 2012. I would hate to see our good neighbor get sucked into statism and
taxation slavery.

Only the lazy, weak minded and poorly educated could possible support
statism and health care the Obama way.