Calif Bill wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
Datesfat Chicks wrote
Rod Speed wrote

I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable
involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially
been excluded.

No it hasnt.

http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html

QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England
Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor,
Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along
with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the
Nazi data and the way it was obtained.

Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt
been excluded.

My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher--
is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it.

You're wrong.

I didn't even know it was available.

Corse it is.

I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me
know where I'm wrong.

Basically it hasnt been excluded.

The question of the "exclusion" of the music

No one is proposing that.

Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to
exclusion in spirit.

Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be
burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either.



The medical data is available. Hard to find, and is extremely
frowned upon to use or quote. Probably enough to derail a career.
Which pretty much excludes it use.

In any case, the objection to the medical data is that it was obtained by
using concentration camp inmates in ways that are considered to be inhumane.
Given that Wagner died 6 years before Hitler was born, it's difficult to see
how that particular objection could apply to him.