"Just wait a frekin' minute!" wrote in
message ...
NotNow wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
You also need to run a records check and insist upon a urine test.

I wouldn't waste the time or money.

Eisboch

Sure...go ahead...hire someone with a criminal record who also abuses
drugs.

:)


I've never done that. One thing nice about a small, privately held
business is that you can hire who you want and, if necessary, fire who
you want without going through an act of congress to do so.
In my experience, I've either directly hired or at least approved the
hiring of probably about 200 people between two companies. Of those,
only 3 had to be terminated later. One was a perpetual trouble maker on
the shop floor who constantly caused problems with others. One was
caught seriously fudging expense reports and bragging about it to others
in the company. The third was a thief.

That's not a bad track record.

Eisboch


Oh hell, now Harry thinks that anyone anybody hires has a criminal record
and abuses drugs. WAFA.

Well, at least if they are not in the Union Pfffttt. I used to see the
windows glowing in the van where the top (union) boys smoked cocaine every
day during lunch... Man, these guys weren't worth a nickel an hour...

Many are not. What's the incentive if they are "protected" by the union? I
have stories....

--Mike