Calif Bill wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
America's 10 Best Undervalued Places to Live: (Percent of
undervaluation, according to IHS Global Insight.)

1. Las Vegas: 41 percent

2. Houston: 37 percent

3. Naples, Fla.: 33 percent

4. Oklahoma City: 29 percent

5. Sarasota, Fla. 28 percent

6. San Francisco: 25 percent

7. Atlanta: 24 percent

8. Omaha: 23 percent

9. College Station-Bryan, Texas: 21 percent

10. San Diego: 21 percent




1. Please. Why would anyone want to live in Las Vegas?

2. Houston. Bad air, bad water, bad schools, lots of flying lead.

3. Naples. Too hot, too many geezers.

4. Oklahoma City. Ever been to Oklahoma? It sucks.

5. Sarasota. Too hot. Geezerville.

6. San Francisco. Sure, but even undervalued, it is still too expensive.
Great city.

7. Atlanta. See Oklahoma.

8. Omaha. Ever been there? See Oklahoma.

9. College-Station. Texas. I wouldn't want to be a long, tall Texan.

10.San Diego. I like it. Almost like it as much as SF, but for different
reasons.


I like Florida, a lot, but for the southern latitudes of Florida, I much
prefer the Atlantic-Carib coast.



--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant. To bad we
can not appoint a wise one to the SCOTUS.
Undervalued? Maybe more in line with what housing should cost.




The few times I looked at the asking prices of property that interested us
north of San Francisco, I was rendered...breathless. These weren't
"estates," either.

Really beautiful areas.

San Diego is more affordable, if less desirable, because we think the
forests and mountains and hills of northern California really can't be
matched anywhere else in the state.



SD is just as expensive as here in the places I want to live. North of SF,
except for the Marin Peninsula is more affordable than the areas in SF and
the East Bay where I reside.



Well, that's interesting. My favorite area...less expensive!





--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant.