On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:51:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:11:43 -0500, wrote:
Subtlety strives to fly under the radar, and
fallacy hasn't avoided you.
That's not very subtle.
If you're referring to my statement statement regarding fallacy, it
wasn't intended to be an adroit exercise in subtlety, merely indirect
in some modest measure. At this point, the thread has degenerated to
the state of simple posturing. The original premise, to give it any
justice, ideally requires a more determined disquisition than I can
afford in a meager posting in this thread. I have taken license to
explore the knowledge base of the antagonist in this thread, though,
in the event that I may find occassion to explore the premise more
thoroughly. Should I ever have that time, I'll be a lucky man.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access