BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

H the K

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:27:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:17:32 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:57:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted
3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.
Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.

Better to be solipsistically exuberant than bogged down by the hypocrisy
of Republican "family values." I think Daedalus said that before taking
off from Crete. Maybe not.
Not. It was Leo Gorcey
Jesus Christ, take it to a men's room stall you two.

Spoken like an experienced politician.

We've gotten used to the mindless gutter badinage that's typically
tossed out by the righties here. Being accused of practicing solipsism,
well...that's at least a step higher on the ladder.