On Jul 10, 10:38*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message

...



On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:22:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
....
On Jul 10, 5:56 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

http://www.thelog.com/news/logNewsArticle.aspx?x=9656

I think it's a good idea myself.
I wonder what happens if you've lost your drivers license due to
previous DUI's though?

jail time?

Sounds good to me.

All sounds reasonable. I wonder how other states handle it.

--Vic

Not sure, but I think it maybe proposed to be fed. law.

That would suck! *More states rights killed. *Actually you can lose you
license in California for lots of things not including driving.
Jaywalking
counts 1-2 points. *At a light it is 2 points. *Bicycle tickets count
points. *You could get your 4 points and not be able to get a license when
you turn 16. *Minor with 0.01 alcohol reading. *Not near a car.

What about a high-speed chase. *See them on TV sometimes.
How many points?
Seems pretty lame to go after a driver's license for non-driving
offenses.
How about non-moving (what we call them in Illinois) offenses.
Broken taillight, for instance.
Don't worry about that California stuff becoming Fed law.
Country won't put up with it.
Don't know why you tolerate it there.

--Vic

More points for highspeed chase. *Get a wreckless driving conviction also.

They need to take this guy to the cleaners.

http://www.thedailytimes.com/article...NEWS/907109989