BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

[email protected]

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:07:05 -0400, HK wrote:

Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:51:29 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:46:52 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:06:17 -0400, "Lu Powell"

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Ensign paid $96k to mistress's family
snipped for brevity

Thus, long lists of Republicans/Democrats don't matter to me. It's the
preaching of Republican hypocrites on matters sexual I'm discussing.

If a Republican or Republicans subscribe to a particular set of moral
strictures, tenets, precepts, and disapprobations, then those persons
have a system by which a violator of those strictures can be judged
for having done so. If there is no value system, there can be no
condemnation. If one can condemn hypocrisy, one has a value system
and is summarily evaluated by that same system. To accuse Republicans
of hypocrisy is itself a hypocrisy. No Republican can take another
Republican to task if the other has crossed the ethical line that
Republicans generally adhere to.

Correction: No Republican can take another Republican to task if
there is no ethical line (such as the moral suasion that Republicans
generally adhere to) for the other to cross.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access