On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:07:05 -0400, HK wrote:

Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:51:29 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:46:52 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:06:17 -0400, "Lu Powell"

wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Ensign paid $96k to mistress's family

But that wasn't my point. My point is the ratio between the parties.

Oh, I see. I'll give you 20 sex deviate conservatives for 10
bribe-taking, womanizing, gay prostituting liberals. Neither side has
a claim on proper behavior. To pretend otherwise is foolish.

Don't bother to reply. We've thrashed this thread to the point of
ridiculousness.


Naw.

Who is going to be the next hypocritical right-wing politician or
preacher who tells us to behave sexually while he isn't?


How about the Rev. Jesse Jackson, erstwhile presidential candidate,
general gadfly, and father of the Democratic Congressman from Illinois?





I wasn't aware that Jackson has been out in the public lately,
condemning the lack of marital morality among national politicians while
following a different set of rules himself.

You still don't get it, Lu-ser. I don't give a damn who Republican
politicians **** on a personal basis. It's their penchant for
castigating others for behaving as they do sexually that I find
hypocritical...and so very Republican.

Thus, long lists of Republicans/Democrats don't matter to me. It's the
preaching of Republican hypocrites on matters sexual I'm discussing.

If a Republican or Republicans subscribe to a particular set of moral
strictures, tenets, precepts, and disapprobations, then those persons
have a system by which a violator of those strictures can be judged
for having done so. If there is no value system, there can be no
condemnation. If one can condemn hypocrisy, one has a value system
and is summarily evaluated by that same system. To accuse Republicans
of hypocrisy is itself a hypocrisy. No Republican can take another
Republican to task if the other has crossed the ethical line that
Republicans generally adhere to. The argument decrying Republican
hypocrisy is specious at best.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access