Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

Captain Marvel of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

What are you liberals so worried about?
She's everything they claim they like in women - strong personality,
effective leadership, mother, interesting life story, good looking and
smart, but...

She's also a hunter, fisherman, Pro-Lifer, gun advocate which is
everything they hate - in particular the Pro-Life thing.

And she had the audacity to actually give birth to what they consider
a defective human being.

Guys like Jon and Harry are Nazi's when it comes to challenged or
physically handicapped children - eugenisists actually. Just as bad as
Goering or Hitler or Spangler. They don't see value in "defective"
children - they consider them "mistakes" and some how not worthy of
life.

Both of them are very sad bitter men.

Unfortunate.





Wow...you really swallowed the 8' asparagus, eh?

Using your terms, I would charactize her as having an extremely flawed
personality, ineffective leadership abilities, being a bad mother, and
being no better than average looking. I've not seen any indicator she is
smart. She's better than ok, though, delivering a teleprompted speech, but
she sure as hell is lost in space without a script.


Yet, you remain infatuated by her, cutting and pasting media articles on
almost a daily basis.


Once again, my interest in Palin is in seeing she remains an anchor
dragging down the GOP ship of state, as it were.




I don't hate people who hunt, fish, or like guns, though I have no respect
for those who hunt with guns and call it "sport."


You live in Maryland. She lives in Alaska. Different culture.


We have plenty of "hunters" in Maryland. I don't consider hunting with
guns a sport.





I also have no respect for moms who do not teach their daughters (and sons)
about effective ways to prevent venereal diseases and unwanted pregnancies.

How do you know she didn't "teach"?

snerk








Palin is a hypocrite. She knew she was carrying a fetus that would turn
out to be a seriously challenged child if born, and also knew that if she
aborted it, she'd lose "cred" with the right-wing simpies.

Another biased Harry assumption. You have no idea what she thought
but proclaim your conclusion, as expected, as being "fact".



For you to claim I see no value in challenged kids says a lot more about
you than it does about me. For starters, it shows you to be completely
clueless.

All of us are clueless about some things. Tom's just trying to help you
out.

Eisboch



Tom should help himself out, and see a counselor about his bipolar
symptoms.