Captain Marvel of Woodstock wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

What are you liberals so worried about?

She's everything they claim they like in women - strong personality,
effective leadership, mother, interesting life story, good looking and
smart, but...

She's also a hunter, fisherman, Pro-Lifer, gun advocate which is
everything they hate - in particular the Pro-Life thing.

And she had the audacity to actually give birth to what they consider
a defective human being.

Guys like Jon and Harry are Nazi's when it comes to challenged or
physically handicapped children - eugenisists actually. Just as bad as
Goering or Hitler or Spangler. They don't see value in "defective"
children - they consider them "mistakes" and some how not worthy of
life.

Both of them are very sad bitter men.

Unfortunate.


Wow...you really swallowed the 8' asparagus, eh?

Using your terms, I would charactize her as having an extremely flawed
personality, ineffective leadership abilities, being a bad mother, and
being no better than average looking. I've not seen any indicator she is
smart. She's better than ok, though, delivering a teleprompted speech,
but she sure as hell is lost in space without a script.

I don't hate people who hunt, fish, or like guns, though I have no
respect for those who hunt with guns and call it "sport." I also have no
respect for moms who do not teach their daughters (and sons) about
effective ways to prevent venereal diseases and unwanted pregnancies.

Palin is a hypocrite. She knew she was carrying a fetus that would turn
out to be a seriously challenged child if born, and also knew that if
she aborted it, she'd lose "cred" with the right-wing simpies.

For you to claim I see no value in challenged kids says a lot more about
you than it does about me. For starters, it shows you to be completely
clueless.

But, then, you're the rec.boats wookie, as in, "Let the wookie win..."