On Jul 4, 2:52*pm, HK wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...
Frogwatch wrote:
Hmm, so the job losses in June were 479,000 jobs and they say this was
a .1% increase. *Do any Libs understand arithematic? *This means the
number of workers would have been 479,000,000. *Uh, NO. *This far more
than the number of people in the USA. *The total number of workers is
less than 200,000,000 so a loss of 479,000 would be nearly 2.5%putting
us at nearly 10% unemployment. *I have not checked their figures for
preceding months but if they lied then too, we can assume the real
unemployment is well over 10%
Its a case of "Liars, damned liars and Democrats".
Actually, it's a case of your not understanding what the numbers mean.

So you think the numbers are good?

I'm not commenting on "the numbers," but, rather, froggy's mathematical
interpretations. Perhaps he should consult with SW Tom, who has an
incredible misunderstanding of the laws of thermodynamics.

So, what is HK interpretation?