On Jul 3, 5:49*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:37:39 -0400, HK wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 3, 5:14 pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:58 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:52:11 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Palin has been dogged in recent months by ethics inquiries. Her office
last month announced the 15th dismissal of an ethics complaint against her
or one of her staff.
Funny how liberal-dims spend so much time on Palin and ignore the obvious
corruption of debt-bailouts from DC.
Guess Palin didn't buy off the the right people.
*We haven't seen the last of
her. *I predict an updated look that suggests less trashy origins..
You liberals *do* like your women plain and "workman-like", don't you?
I imagine you'd say Pelosi and Hillary are hot, right?
~snerk~
I'm supposed to care whether Mrs. Pelosi or Mrs. Clinton are "hot"?

I never thought Palin was hot.

No ****, sherlock... that's *the first time you've posted that
particular opinion. *roll-eyes

You must care... after all, you keep harping on Palin's appearance...
so appearance must mean something to you, right?

So answer my question... Why are you liberals attracted to fat, ugly
women with hair under their arms? *Self-loathing?

What? I've never expressed interest in your wife, or the wives of any of
the other far-right-righties here.

Think Angelina Jolie is a winger? *Think about any "hot" actress in
Hollywood and you'd be hard pressed to find a Publican.

They have brains as well as beauty.

heheh... jps thinks actresses are smart. ~snerk~