BAR wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than
he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during
20 years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife
with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How
much as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money
on it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning
moderate until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center
when he showed (and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are.
I'm not really talking about their politics either... just their
behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to
pretty much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and
the rest of us do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.



There's been a name change...libertarians officially have changed their
name to...


Loonitarians!


All the selfishness of Republicans, with even less responsibility.